- #Dashlane for firefox for mac
- #Dashlane for firefox update
- #Dashlane for firefox upgrade
- #Dashlane for firefox password
Then press the pencil (edit) icon for the account you want to change. To change your passwords automatically with Auto-Password Change you have to open your LastPass Vault by click on the extension’s icon in your browser.
#Dashlane for firefox password
Key event not available on some keyboard layouts: key=“i” modifiers=“accel,alt,shift” browser.xulīy this point I don't know if what I have is correct.LastPass can automatically change your password on about 75 websites. Key event not available on some keyboard layouts: key=“r” modifiers=“accel,alt” browser.xul Key event not available on some keyboard layouts: key=“c” modifiers=“accel,alt” browser.xul (unknown)įirefox can’t establish a connection to the server at ws://127.0.0.1:32934/.
(unknown)įirefox can’t establish a connection to the server at ws://127.0.0.1:21953/. (unknown)įirefox can’t establish a connection to the server at ws://127.0.0.1:17896/. (unknown)įirefox can’t establish a connection to the server at ws://127.0.0.1:15674/. Deny on įirefox can’t establish a connection to the server at ws://127.0.0.1:11456/.
#Dashlane for firefox update
Update your code and pass the correct originAttributes. Warning: NetUtil.newChannel(uri) deprecated, please provide argument 'aWhatToLoad' Use of nsIDOMWindowInternal is deprecated. This happened early on 11/23 (Pacific Standard Time)įF 50 - I upgraded FF to try to fix the problem, but Dashlane is still brokenĬode: Select all Could not read chrome manifest 'file:///C:/Program%20Files/Mozilla%20Firefox/chrome.manifest'.
#Dashlane for firefox upgrade
Here is a better timeline:įF 49 - a day or so ago, I started getting notices to upgrade to FF 50įF 49 - Dashlane breaks before I upgrade FF. I was getting notifications to upgrade to FF 50 for a least a day before Dashlane/NoScript broke in FF 49. It's possible that NoScript was changed in advance to try to work around a problem the developers knew was coming in Firefox 50, but FF 50 was released before this problem occurred in NoScript. (The executables are in AppData\Roaming\Dashlane, not in Program Files.)
My dashlane executables seem to have been updated on or before that date. Is this a safe thing to allow? What is the nature of typical external attacks on local that ABE is designed to prevent?ĭid something change in NoScript, or did something change in a Dashlane update? According to Dashlane changelog, the most recent version of Dashlane for Windows - version 4.6.3 - was released on November 15 - 8 or 9 days before this problem surfaced. This rule apparently allows any GET operation from anywhere to succeed, regardless of source - which seems like it might break a fair amount of ABE protection by allowing some operations to succeed? The existing rule allows any behavior from local, and denies everything else. Let me know if I am overlooking something. It might help diagnose matters if the changelog at included date/time and not just version number of updates, and/or if there were a straightforward way to tell when NoScript updates on a computer.
#Dashlane for firefox for mac
I am running FF 49.0.1 for Mac - and Dashlane is working on that platform with NoScript 2.9.0.14, not sure why it is so far behind.
An update to NoScript seems to have hit at about the same time as a new version of Firefox. If there was just a change to NoScript in the last day, that may be the problem.
I think I noticed a recent update to NoScript? Currently I have NoScript 2.9.5.1 installed. So Dashlane stopped working - and, actually, to try to FIX this, I updated to FF 50, which obviously didn't help. I've been ignoring the FF notifications to update to FF 40 the last couple of days. The problem started, actually - this morning, when I was still on prior version of FF. This was happening before FF 50 for Windows. The script may not be initialized yet, or may already have been unloaded. Code: Select all dashlane-extension:Error: Couldn't find the worker to receive this message.
0 kommentar(er)
